The Japan Year Book
Forty years of rise, then fall
By William Wetherall
First posted 25 June 2007
Last updated 3 October 2020
Yearbooks
1900
•
1910
•
1919-20
•
1926
•
1930
•
1936
•
1940-41
•
1943-44
•
1946-48
•
1949-52
•
1953
•
1964
Races Race of the Japanese Empire Country
1936
•
1940-41
•
1943-44
•
1946-48
•
1964
Koreans Chosenese
Origin of Korean race
•
Origin of Korean native race
•
Koreans and Eta
•
Special people
Other features
Alien laborers in Japan
•
Expatriation of Japanese
•
Population of Japan Nippon proper
•
Ethnological origins of Japan
•
Korea, China, and Japan
•
Before and after Jinmu
•
Fall of Nanking and Wang Ching-wei
•
1937-1946 chronicle
•
SCAP definitions of "Japan"
•
Unification of Empire
•
Integration of Karafuto into Interior
•
East Asiatic New Order
•
What Yoshida Shigeru said about Karafuto and Chishima
Japan yearbooks
In this section I will examine four volumes from each of two series of prewar yearbooks which amount to two parts of a continous series delimited by a change of publishers, editors, and printers. I will also introduce a few publications that came out before and after these two series.
Three volumes framing series
Before introducing the main series, let me list the volumes that will bracket the series.
Turn-of-century Japan
The Japanese government published the following volume to celebrate Japan's achievements during the Meiji period up to the turn of the 19th century. Though not a yearbook, it presented a comprehensive verbal and statistical overview of Japan in the manner of a yearbook.
Japan in the Beginning of the 20th Century, compiled by the Department of Agriculture and Commerce of Japan, and published in 1904 by Tokyo Shoin.
Postwar newspaper year-book
Maichi Newspaper Company began publishing an English yearbook after World War II. The series continued for about three decades, somewhat irregularly at the end of its run.
New Japan, A Year Book Published By The Mainichi Newspapers, Volume 6, 20 May 1953.
Japan circa Tokyo Olympics
The Ministry of Education oversaw that compilation of the following compendium, revised in time for the 1964 Summer Olypics.
Japanese National Commission for UNESCO, Japan: Its Land, People and Culture, Tokyo: Printing Bureau, Ministry of Finance, 1964, Revised Edition, copyright by Ministry of Education.
The main yearbook series
The main yearbook series actually consists of two series, the first published by the Japan Year Book Office from 1906-1931, and the second by the Foreign Affairs Association of Japan from 1931 to 1952.
Confirmed publication years are shown in (parentheses). Unconfirmed years are shown in [brackets]. Some other information in the following table is also tentative.
All citations in this report are from original copies, in my library, of the editions highlighted by boldface.
The Japan Year Book Series 1 1906-1931 |
Japan Year Book Office |
1st 1906 (1905) This marks the change to a larger size to facilitate statistics. It also marks a change in the numbering. Up to this point, "annual publication" counted the years the the series represented -- i.e., from 1906 to 1921, then 1923 and 1924 -- no 1922 because of the 1923 Great Kanto Earthquake. Whereas from this point, "year of issue" counted years elapsed from and including 1905 -- the first year of publication. The publicity people, as well as the design and layout staff, were learning new tricks. 22nd year of issue, 1926 (1926) |
The Japan Year Book Series 2 1932-1952 |
Foreign Affairs Association of Japan |
1931 [1931] ? |
1900 Japan in the Beginning of the 20th Century | |||
The Department of Agriculture and Commerce, Japan ColophonThis book was printed on 27 June and published on 30 June 1904, compiled by 農商務省 (Nōshōmushō), published by 東京書院 (Tokyo Shoin), and printed by ジャパン、タイムス社 (Japan Taimusu Sha). |
|||
This publication celebrated the achievements of Japan from the start of the Meiji period in 1868, through 1900, the year after Japan had terminated the last of the extraterritorial treaties it had signed with the United States, Britain, and other countries that now regarded Japan as legally competent state. It describes the "five large islands" of the Empire of Japan as "Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Hokkaido and Formosa". Smaller islands include "Sado, Oki, Iki, Tsushima, Awaji and the Pescadores (which are, however, a group of islands)" and then the three achipeleagoes of "Chishima [the Kuriles], Ogasawara (the Bonin Islands) and Okinawa (the Luchu)" (page 2). Two paragraphs headed "Japan's Unique Nationality" starts with the observation that "Owing to its peculiar geographical position our country constitutes a community distinct in several respects, socially and politically, from the adjacent countries of Asia" (page 5). Practically everything that follows this statement has to do with customs and institutions. References to Japan as " a number of the familiy of nations" and its movement to "the front rank in the comity of nations" suggest that "nationality" means "national character" in the present-day sense of "ethnicity" as a strait of a racioethnic "nation". A chapter on "Population" describes four social classes -- Imperial family, Peers, Shizoku, Heimin. The populations of Peers, Shizoku, and Heimin are given for 1879, 1882, 1887, 1892, 1897, and 1898. But in in no way is the population described in racioethnic terms. "Emigration and Immigration" talks about "Emigration at Home" in terms of "emigration to Hokkaido from the rest of Japan proper". It talks about "Emigration Abroad" in terms of "Japanese staying Abroad" and "Foreigners in Japan". Some 12,536 foreigners (8,983 male, 3553 female) -- of whom 6,896 were Chinese (5,394 males, 1,496 females) -- were counted in Japan in 1900. [The total for Chinese should be 6,890.] Though the purpose of this volume is clearly celebratory, the tone of its presentation is fairly level. At times it leans on the boastful side of proud -- as in phrases like "an Imperial House of unbroken lineage from the remotest antiquity" -- which has endured for "more than 2,000 years" during which "the nation has undergone various changes" -- yet "this glorious dynasty has always remained unchanged". "Formosa""Formosa", previously listed as one of the main islands of Japan, is described in a 57-page supplement at the very end of the book (pages 772-828). Part C, History, while self-serving in terms of Japan's need to justify its harsh suppression of rebellious elements in Taiwan at the time, is nonetheless a fairly frank account of the political history of the island -- mindful that "history" means written accounts (pages 775-776, 780-781, [bracketed] remarks mine).
Part D, Population, begins with census tables for the total population of Formosa and the Pescadores by district, in terms of number of families, sex, and affiliation, and also has breakdowns by district for number of resident families, and people actually residing, "classified according to the origin of the three main divisions of people in Formosa, that is, people from Japan proper, native islands, and aborigines" (page 783). Section 3 of Part D is dedicated the "Human Races in the Islands" as follows (pages 785-787, underscoring added, [bracketed] remarks mine).
|
1910 Japan Year Book | |
Y. Takenobu and K. Kawakami ColophonThis was the 2nd printing of a revised and expanded version of the 5th edition. The 1st edition was published in September 1905. The 1st printing of the 5th edition was published in December 1909. This revised and expanded version came out in January 1910, and this 2nd printing came out in February 1910. The colophon also states that the yearbook was edited by 武信由太郎 (Takenobu Yoshitaro) and 川上邦基 (Kawakami Kunimoto), published by 英文日本年鑑発行所 (Eibun Nihon Nenkan Hakko Sho), and printed by 教文館 (Kyobunkan). "Korea" and "Taiwan (Formosa)"Undated foldout map -- "General Map of Japan, Korea, & Manchuria" -- shows "Korea" and "Taiwan (Formosa)". |
|
PopulationJapan's population is not described in racioethnic terms. However, Ainu are enumerated after foreigners. Populations are given by "Social Rank" (Peers, Shizoku, Heimin). "Japanese Abroad" are tallied by country. "Foreigners Residing in Japan" are broken down by nationality. Since Korea is at the time not part of Japan but only a protectorate, Koreans in Japan are listed under foreigners. Populations for "Ainu in Hokkaido" are shown at the very end of the "Population" chapter, immediately below the breakdown for foreigners. The totals were 1905 (19,632), 1906 (17,422), and 1907 (17,715). Formosa, Saghalien, South Manchuria, and KoreaThe final three chapters are devoted to Formosa, Karafuto (Saghalien), South Manchuria, and Korea. Their order signifies the chronological order they became entities of Japan, either as parts of Japan's sovereign dominion (Formosa, Karafuto), or as a leased territory (Southern Manchuria) or a protectorate (Korea). FormosaFormosa is not called Taiwan. Its population is broken down by year and sex into three groups -- Japanese, Natives, and Savages. "The Aborigines" are described as consiting of "nine different tribes, ethnologically all more or less allied to the Malay race" (pages 620-621). They are "The Aborigine's Region" are described in some detail. The main subsection is titled "The Frontier Guard Zone", which is said to be "for guarding the frontier to prevent the descent of the savages upon the plains" (page 621). Karafuto"Karafuto (Saghalien)" is described as the territory, below the 50th parallel of the island, acquired as a result of the Portsmouth Treaty of 1905. This is the treaty settled the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905. Karafuto's population is described as follows (page 630). Foreigners, Aborigines, etc. The Southern Saghalien contained roughly 10,000 Russians of all descriptions before the outbreak of the war, and of these only 300 remain, these being mostly poor people who were devoid of means of leaving the place and removing to Russian territory. Besides the above, there are about 1,291 aborigines consisting of five tribes, as Ainus, Gilyak, Orochon, Tonguz and Yanguz. South ManchuriaThis refers to Kwantung Province, which Russia -- to keep a more complex story short -- had leased from China in 1898, then ceded its leasehold to Japan in 1905. Unlike Formosa and Karafuto, Kwantung was not part of Japan's sovereign dominion. It was, however, a Japanese entity, under the Government-General of Kwantung (関東都督府 Kantō Totokufu). KoreaKorea, at the time this yearbook was published, was not yet part of Japan's sovereign dominion. It's inclusion here is justified by the fact that the Empire of Korea had become a protectorate of Japan. Japan's Residency-Government of Korea was formally responsible for Korea's defense and diplomacy. In other words, even before the Emperor of Korea ceded his sovereignty over Korea to the Emperor of Japan in August of 1910, Korea had lost its status as a legally fully competent state. |
1926 Japan Year Book | ||
Y. Takenobu ColophonThis was the 22nd edition, revised and enlarged, both printed and published on 25 March 1926 -- the 25th day of the 3rd month of 15th year of Taisho. Emperor Taisho did not die until 25 December that year. This edition, still nominally edited by Takenobu Yoshitaro and published by Eibun Nihon Nenkan Sha, was printed by the printing division of the Japan Times. The preface remarks that this edition is of a larger size than earlier editions in order to better facilitate statistical tables and maps. "Chosen (Korea)" and "Taiwan (Formosa)"Undated foldout map -- "General Map of Japan, Korea, & Manchuria" -- shows "Chosen (Korea)" and "Taiwan (Formosa)". "Iwo Island"A full-page "Map of Volcanoes and Seismic foci" (page 29) shows "Kita-Iwō I." and "Minami-Iwō I." for what some people have called "Iwo Jima" or "Iwojima" but which was then "Iwōtō" (硫黄島) and is again "Iwoto" in Japan. The 24th edition of Kenkyusha's New Japanese English Dictionary (新和英大辞典), published on 20 April 1933, directs one from "iwō (硫黄)" to "iō (硫黄)" -- the word for "sulphur" and related compounds. No entry is given for the island. The title page of the dictionary show that the "General Editor" is "Takenobu Yoshitaro" (written this way, family name first) -- the very same "Y. Takenobu" who was editor of the yearbook. |
||
PopulationThe population of Japan is not explicitly racialized (page 39). . . . In passing, it may be mentioned that the total population for the whole Empire [based on the 1920 census] is put at 77,005,510, distributed as follows: -- Japan proper 55,961,140, Taiwan 3,654,398, Karafuto 105,765, Chosen 17,284,207. The last figure does not represent the result of the census but is based upon register calculation. The number of families aggregates 15,231,425. . . . As in previous volumes, figures are given for the Population of Japan Proper, Japanese Residing Abroad, Japanese Going Abroad (passports issued), Japanese Emigrants, and Foreign Residents in Japan. In the Population chapter, except for the figures cited above, there are no other mentions of, or breakdowns by, Chosen, Taiwan, or Karafuto. Manchuria, Kwantung, Tsingtao, and the Japanese Mandate [islands] are integrated into "Japanese Residing Abroad" tables (pages 44-46). NaturalizationA paragraph on "Naturalization" is included in a brief section on "Legal Status of Foreigners" (pages 48-49). Statistics are given for foreigners who have become "a Japanese subject" and thus able to "enjoy the same status as native subjects, so far as right and privileges are concerned" (page 48). The statistics break down acquisition of Japanese nationality by means -- Marrying into family, Adopted, Naturalized, Rehabilitated -- which reflect provisions in the 1899 Nationality Law. Expatriation of JapaneseExpatriation is topical because this edition appeared shortly after the movements in the United States, culminating in 1924, to categorically exclude certain nationalities of aliens from immigration, including Japanese, and to press Japan, which permitted dual nationality, to take measures to prevent the activation of dual nationality among offspring born in the United States to Japanese who had migrated there. Here is the entire paragraph related to expatriation.
TerritoriesChosenThe chapter on Chosen (Korea) divides the population into Natives, Japanese in Korea, and Foreigners in Korea. TaiwanThe population of Taiwan is divided into Japanese, Natives, and Foreigners. The section on "The Aborigines" marginally updates the paragraph on "The Frontier Guard Zone" (still there to "prevent the descent of the savages upon the plains"). The section on the "Subjugation Program" regurgerates the earlier accounts. There "head-hunting savages" still occupy "a hilly and inaccessible region between the central mountain chain and Karneko harbor on the eastern coast." The statisitics are partly different and partly the same: "Out of the total tribes of 697 with 130,000 inhabitants, 551 tribes representing 116,744 have vowed allegiance and the balance are still to be dealt with" (page 605). KarafutoThe composition of Karafuto's small population has considerably changed since the report in the 1919-1920 yearbook (page 615). The native inhabitants consist of various tribes, as Ainus (1,491), Gilyaks (77), Orotchones (214), and Tungues (6). These are gradually dwindling in number. The rest of the population consists of Japanese (136,928), Koreans (1,398), Chinese (132), and Russians (88). Most notable here is the change in order of the listing of "native inhabitants" -- Ainu, Gilyak [Nivkh], and Orotchones [Orok, Uilta]. There is now a section called "Japanese Immigrants" (page 616). In April, 1919, it was gazetted that a small sum of money will be granted to those immigrants who settle down within 6 months of their coming over to the island. land to be leased to the settlers covers 134,378 "cho." The number of peasant settlers from Japan proper numbered 2,348 in 1921; 3,949 in 1922; and 9,340 in 1923. Immigrants from Hokkaido headed the list, amounting to 5,703 in 1923. The South Sea IslandsThe indolent, easy-going natives are still subsisting on natural production and superficially embracing Christianity. |
1930 Japan Year Book | ||
Y. Takenobu ColophonThis 26th edition, revised and enlarged, was printed on 25 November and published on 28 November 1929. This edition, too, was edited by Takenobu Yoshitaro, published by Eibun Nihon Nenkan Sha, and printed by the Japan Times. MapsThere does not appear to have been a general foldout map of Japan. The two foldout maps are small. The "Topographical Map of Japan" shows "Chosen" and "Karafuto" and and "Taiwan Range". The "Communications Map of Japan" shows "Taiwan" and "Karafuto" but only the the tip of the Korean peninsula without naming it. Dust jacketThe spine of the dust jacket of this edition show its Japanese title to be 英文日本年鑑 (Eibun Nihon Nenkan). The titling on the front cover of the dust jacket is somewhat different than on the title page.
|
||
PopulationThere is no fundamental change in the manner of reporting the "Population" of Japan as the population of "Japanese" in "Japan proper" and abroad -- with some figures on "Foreigners" in Japan. There are no figures, here, for Chosen, Taiwan, or Karafuto subjects in "Japan proper" -- though these territories are clearly treated as part of "Japan" and their subjects are clearly differented from "Foreigners". TerritoriesChapters on Chosen, Taiwan, Karafuto, and South Manchuria & South Sea Islands come at the end, as usual. ChosenThe population of Chosen is described a bit differently compared with the 1926 edition. Natives are still natives but "Japanese in Korea" are now "Japanese in Chosen and Koreans in Japan Proper". And "Foreigners in Korea" are now "Foreigners in Chosen". Throughout the chapter, "Chosen" or "Peninsula" have replaced vestiages of "Korea" in earlier yearbooks. However, the "natives" are still "Koreans". While "Japanese in Chosen and Koreans in Japan Proper" promises statistics on the number of "Koreans" in "Japan Proper", there is only this explanation of why such figures are not confirmed (page 475). Though no exact data are available as to the number of Koreans, mostly laborers, in Japan proper, the latest police returnes put the figure at 238,000 and say that some 6,600 are newly arriving yearly. About 1914 [of] these laborers did not exceed 3,630. This large presence of Korean laborers is considered problmematical in view of the intensified unemployment question in Japan proper. Data in the general chapter on population concerns "Japanese" and "Foreigners" in "Japan proper" -- but not subjects of Chosen, Taiwan, or Karafuto in "Japan proper". The general chapter also includes "Japanese" abroad -- but not subjects of Chosen, Taiwan, or Karafuto who are abroad. Population data in the chapters on Chosen and Taiwan have in principle included "Natives", "Japanese", and "Foreigners". The above reference to "Koreans in Japan Proper" is made only because their increase there has become a problem. Statistics on territorial subjects living abroad are apparently not considered reportable. Taiwan"The Aborigines" still number "nine different tribes, ethnologically all more or less allied to the Malay race" (page 488). Sections formerly headed "The Frontier Guard Zone" and "Subjugation Program" have been replaced by sections titled "Subjugation and Pacification" and "The New Local Administration". Proof of "Subjugation and Pacification" is shown by statistics (page 489). The victims of violence by the savages markedly fell off. The total till the end of 1927 reached 6,918. The heaviest toll was 761 in 1912 as against 41 in 1918, 2 each in 1925 & 1926 and 9 in 1927. KarafutoThe chapter on Karafuto -- formally called "Karafuto (Saghalien)" -- is now dubbed "Karafuto (Saghalien, Sourthern Half Below 50°)". The purpose of qualifying "Karafuto" ad "Saghalien" had been, in part, diplomatic deference to Russia and then the Soviet Union, and in part a way to identify the locality for readers more familiar with its Russian name. However, "Saghalien" (if not also "Karafuto") was the name of the entire island -- hence the clarification that the Japanese territory of "Karafuto" consisted only of the southern half of what others may call "Saghalien" if they wish. The population of Karafuto has, again, significantly changed. Population at the end of 1928 was 240,502, comprising 233,935 Japanese, 4,300 Koreans, 1,993 natives and 274 foreigners. The native inhabitants consist of various tribes, i.e. Ainus (1,534), Gilyaks (50), Orochones (293), and Tungues (111). These are gradually dwindling in number. The boilerplate "gradually dwindling in number" is curious -- since, if anything, the populations of the "native inhabitants" (except the Gilyaks) appear to be holding their own if not increasing. The section previously called "Japanese Immigrants" has been expanded to "Farming and Immigrants" (page 498). The South Sea IslandsThe natives are still indolent, easy-going, subsisting on natural production, and superficially Christian. |
1936 Japan Year Book | |||||||||||
K. Inahara (editor) ColophonI suspect there was a paste-in colophon on the end page of the main text before the advertising section in the back but it is missing. At the bottom of this page is printed "The Foreign Affairs Association of Japan" and its address "556-8 Osaka Building, Hibiya Park, Tokyo"., but given the date of the preface, the volume was probaly both printed and published the same year. This edition is part of the third series. In size it is larger than the first and smaller than the second, but thicker than either. Content wise, it is radically different, reflecting the fact that it is under the editorship of The Foreign Affairs Association of Japan (日本外事協会 Nihon Gaiji Kyōkai). |
|||||||||||
GeographyIn the earlier series of yearbooks, "colonies" was not used in referring to any of Japan's "territories". In this series, the first paragraph of the Geography chapter begins with the statement that "The Japanese Empire, wholly within the Asiatic half of the North Pacific, consists of Japan proper and various colonies" (page 30). The rest of the first paragraph describes Japan Proper. The second and third paragraphs, headed "The Colonies", describe all other territories affiliated with the empire. PopulationThe Population chapter is very different. The organization is better and there is a greater variety of social statistics. While the focus is still on "Japan proper", the demographic profile of the entire Empire is clearer. Empire Note that, whereas the previous series had gravitated toward "Chosen" and "Taiwan" in all references to these territories, this series has drifted back to usage of "Korea" and "Formosa" also. The chapter now includes a verbal summary of the "Races of the Japanese Empire" and a statistical summary of the "Population of Japan Proper by Different Nationalities". Both of sections appear in later editions with editing that reflects changes in sentiments about how the empire should be described in English. Races of Japan proper and improperHere is the entire description of "races" within the Japanese Empire (pages 62-63).
Japan Proper by nationalitiesImmediately following the above overview is a table showing the "Population of Japan Proper by Different Nationalities" based on the 1930 census (page 63). The demographic picture painted by the table is very odd, though. If "nationality" is being used as a term in Japanese and international law, then here it would mean to distinguish "Japanese subjects" (nationals of Japan) from "Foreigners" (nationals of other countries). However, in a paragraph on the "Position of Koreans" in a section called "Administrative Organization" in the "Chosen (Korea)" chapter, the following statement is made (page 1071). [P]rior to March, 1920, in the courts Korean judges were allowed to try only those civil cases in which both parties were Koreans and the criminal caes where they accused were Koreans, but now they are allowed to try all cases in which people of any nationality may be involved. Arguably the writers intend to imply that "Japanese" and "Koreans" and the others categories of "Japanese subjects" are also "nationalities" -- which is totally at odds with the operation of Japan's Nationality Law and other status laws that government a person's Japanese nationality and/or subjecthood. They are also at odds with meaning of Japan's census figures. "Ainu"Note that "Ainu" are not one of the cohorts of "Japanese subjects". Why? Because Hokkaido (including Chishima) "Ainu" registers had been mainstreamed with other domicile registers in the prefecture. Moreover, Karafuto "Ainu" registers are already being treated as treated as "Japan proper" (Naichi, prefectural Interior) registers. Since its start in 1920, Japan's national census has differentiated people by register status -- not by putative race. "Ainu" affiliated with a prefecture have been "Naichijin". The 1920 census breakdowns of register status by prefecture has columns of male and female "Hokkaido Former Natives" are shown WITHIN the "Naichijin" group of columns, immediately to the right of the "Total" male and female Naichijin columns, and aare represended as INCLUDED in the total figures (see below). "Koreans" and "Formosans"Likewise, "Koreans" and "Formosans" reflect counts of people with domicile registers affiliated with Korea or Taiwan -- regardless of their putative race. "Gilyaks and Orokes""Gilyaks" and "Orokes" on Karafuto had been gathered in a settlement called Otasu no Mori (オタスの杜) near Sisuka (敷香 R. Poronaysk). Unlike Ainu, they continued to be enrolled in segregated aborigine registers. The actual census reports, however, refer to them simply as "Karafutoans" (see below). "Westerners on Bonin"The "Westerners in Bonin" category in the 1920 and 1930 yearbook statistics is puzzling. The category appears to be an error for South Pacific Mandate Islanders residing in the Interior -- as the populations reported are people domiciled in the prefectural "Naichi" (Interior) by their territorial register affiliation within Japan in the case of imperial subjects, or by their nationality in the case of aliens. In 1876, Japan declared the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands to be part of its inherent dominion. The nationalized islands were initially placed under the Interior Ministry (内務省 Naimusho), but in 1880 they were integrated into Tokyo prefecture (東京府 Tokyofu), and in 1882 their original alien inhabitants became Japanese. Ogasawaran registers made some distinctions between the descendants of the earlier alien settlers, who Japan had enrolled in population registers established between 1877 and 1882. The settlers did not "naturalize" in 1882 -- a legal process not possible until 1899 -- but were "naturalized" or rather "nationalized" into Japanese subjecthood. However, they were not separately tallied in census reports.
NaturalizationThe paragraphs on naturalization, and statistics on foreigners who have become Japanese, have been dropped from this series. EmigrationThe emigration section in this series is very different from that of the previous series. The 1930 yearbook had paragraphs on emigration to Asiatic Russia, Malay Peninsula, Hawaiian Islands, The Philippine Islands, Mexico, Cuba, Canada, The United States, and Brazil & Other S. American States. The 1936 yearbook had paragraphs on only Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Other South American Countries, Mexico, Philippines, and Other South Sea Countries. The shift of focus is from countries that exclude Japanese immigrants to countries that welcome them. Whereas the 1930 yearbook did not mention the racialist immigration and naturalization policies of the United States, the 1936 yearbook directly confronts exclusion policies (page 76). By 1904, the movement of Japanese from Hawaii to the mainland of the United States had assumed sizable proportions, as had emigration to that country directly from Japan. In the so-called Gentlemen's Agreement, signed in 1908, Japan agreed to restrict the issue of passports to nationals wishing to enter the United States. The United States Supreme court decided in 1922 that Japanese are ineligible for citizenship, and two years later the Quota Immigration Act was passed, containing a clause denying the right of entry into the United States for permanent residence or any person not eligible for citizenship. Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Canada also provided, by various methods, for exclusion of Japanese. TerritoriesThe territorial chapters in the back include Chosen (Korea), Taiwan (Formosa), Karafuto (Saghalien), South Sea Islands (Under Japan's Mandate) -- after which comes an unchaptered section, separated by yellow dividers, on "Manchoukuo". ChosenThroughout the "Chosen (Korea)" chapter, the name of the territory is "Chosen" but "Korean" is used both as an adjective for Chosen, and as a noun designating a person affiliated with Chosen. However, care has been taken to use "Korea" in references to the country before it was annexed and became a territory -- hence "Bank of Korea" before annexation and "Bank of Chosen" after (pages 1078-1079). The chapter on the population of Chosen includes this long paragraph on the "Korean Race" (page 1070). The paragraph is structurally almost identical to those which had been published in editions of the Annual Report on Administration of Chosen since at least the mid 1920s. For comparison, I have also shown the paragraph from the 1932-1933 edition the Chosen report, compiled by the Government General of Chosen in Keijo [Seoul], edited by Foreign Affairs Section, and printed by Toppan in Tokyo (pages 19-20). The same paragraph appears in the 1924-1926, 1927-1928, and 1930-1932 reports -- among those I possess.
The 1924-1926 edition of the "Annual Report on Administration of Chosen" (Editor: Sainosuke Kiriyama; Printers: Chosen Book-Printing Co., Keijo) is essentially identical except that it has one additional -- and extremely significant -- line at the end (page 6). So the recent union of the two nations may well be regarded as the reunion of two brothers long separated by untoward circumstances. This line must have been problematic, for it was cut from the next (1927-1928) edition , and was not later restored in any of the editions in my possession (1930-1932, 1932-1933). However, this line, in Japanese, is the center of gravity of arguments as to why Chosenese should be made to adopt interior-style family names See Soshi kaimei myths: Confusion then, misunderstanding now for an overview of "create family name, change given name" issues. In both the 1930-1932 edition (December 1932) and 1932-1933 edition (December 1933), both edited by the Foreign Affairs Section and printed in Tokyo, the following line appears at the beginning of a section called "Koreans Abroad" (pages 16 in both editions). Koreans Abroad By one theory the cradle of the Korean race was in a place called Fuyo, on the River Sungari near Changchun, Manchuria, before the Christian era and innumerable Koreans as well as those of mixed race remained and scattered all over Manchuria and Mongolia. It seems therefore, natural for them to settle in these sections. These remarks are best understood in the context of Japan's emerging interest in Manchuria, which came to a head in the Mukden Incident of 1931, and the establishment of Manchoukuo as a puppet state in 1932 (see "Manchoukuo" below). TaiwanThe population of "Taiwan (Formosa)" as of the end of 1934 is statistically broken down as follows (page 1101). [ 1934 ] Total number Male Female Percentage Japanese 262,964 138,816 124,148 5.1% Koreans 1,316 470 846 0.0 Natives 4,882,288 2,484,771 2,397,517 94.0 Aboriginal savages 148,472 74,404 74,068 2.9 (Included in natives) Chinese 48,193 31,926 16,267 0.9 Foreigners 219 115 104 0.0 Total 5,194,980 2,656,098 2,538,882 100.0 The text observes that "Including the savages, the total population at the end of 1934 in Taiwan was 5,194,980" (page 1101, underscoring mine). The underscored phrasing is confusing, since the total in the table already clearly includes the savages, since it clearly includes the Natives, which includes the savages. The table should have placed (parentheses) around each of the "Aboriginal savages" figures to stress that these figures are, in fact, not included in the total. The differentiation between "Chinese" and "Foreigners" continues until 1937, when "Chinese" and "Foreigners" are combined (see 1943-1944 yearbook). The "Chinese" would have been those on Taiwan in 1895 who chose to remain Chinese nationality rather than become Japanese under the terms of the Treaty of Shimonoseki -- and Chinese who arrived after this date who had not naturalized -- in other words, foreigners of Chinese nationality. The section on Aboriginal Administration is greatly expanded. Populations are given for seven tribes and others. Some of the tribes -- at least four -- are still restless (page 1104). The Four Tribes The savages of the Taiyal and Bunun tribes are known as the most ferocious of all. Occasionally they quarrel with and even kill their own comrades. The Tsuwo tribe abolished the custom of head-hunting many years ago. The Saiset tribesmen are the gentlest of all, and are quickly losing their savage proclivities. The Japanese authorities have cudgelled their brains how to bring these wild people under control. This continues for another page and a half. KarafutoThe "Population by Race or Nationality" of Karafuto was as follows, as of the end of 1934 -- which means that the figures are based on domicile registers, not national census data (page 1126). Population by Race or Nationality Japanese 304,995 Korean 5,878 Ainu 1,958 Other Natives 2 Chinese 72 German 6 Polish 26 Russian 193 Total 313,130 South Sea IslandsThis chapter is greatly expanded. Three pages are devoted to the Population, Tribes, Customs and Manners, and Social Conditions (pages 1142-1145) -- half to an ethnographic profile of the "Tribes" and their "Customs and Manners". Some tribes are "cheerful in disposition, but extremely lazy." Tribes generally are wearing more clothing. "The custom of driving a hole through the ear-lobe for an ear-ring or other dangling ornaments has been becoming less common of late years, due principally to the diffusion of education." Gokurosama. ManchoukuoThe section on Manchoukuo is sandwiched between yellow interleaves in its own section following all the numbered chapters (1159-1214). It is nearly twice as long as the Chosen chapter, which is the longest of chapters devoted to territories. Shortly before the 1930-1932 and 1932-1933 editions of the above mentioned "Annual Report on Administration of Chosen" were published, the Mukden Incident of 1931 had become the pretext for a Japanese invasion of Manchuria. On 18 February 1932, at the bequest of Japanese occupiers, the "Last Emperor of China" Puyi established a new state called Manchukuo (満州國 WG Manchoukuo, Manshūkoku). Puyi allowed Japan free reign in what was essentially a puppet state. Its capital was Changchun (長春 Chángchūn, J. Chōshun), renamed as Hsinking (新京 Xīnjīng, J. Shinkyō) or "New Capital"). Japan's actions in Manchuria in 1931 marked the start of what some people call the Second Sino-Japanese War or Fifteen-year War (1931-1945). They also marked the beginning of the spiral of diplomatic falling out that resulted in Japan's invasion of China in 1937 and its attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. Only about twenty-five percent of the eighty or so member states of the League of Nations recognized Manchukuo. In 1933, Japan resigned its membership when the league declared that Manchuria should remain part of the Republic of China. The "Foreign Relations" chapter in the 1936 yearbook gives eleven pages to the "Manchurian Incident, Founding of Manchoukuo" and issues involving Sino-Japanese relations and the League of Nations (pages 207-217). These pages immediately segue from a three-page discussion of souring relations with the United States -- which begins with a reference to "Manchuria and China proper" in connection with America's "Open Door" policy of 1899 -- and moves on to America's exclusionist immigration and naturalization policies and finally America's position concerning "the Manchurian and Shanghai affairs in 1931 and 1932" (pages 204-207). |
1940-1941 Japan Year Book | ||||||
The Foreign Affairs Association of Japan ColophonA paste-in colophon showed the Japanese title to be 英文日本年鑑 (Eibun Nippon nenkan). The edition was printed on 15 December and published on 20 December 1940 -- a full year before Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. The publisher was 日本外事協会 (Nihon Gaiji Kyōkai), and its name and address is shown at the bottom of the colophon in English. Though the colophon says the volume was printed by 研究社 (Kenkyusha), the otherwise blank page facing the title page states "The Japan Times Press". |
||||||
PopulationThe section on "Races of the Japanese Empire" is substantially the same. "Korea" been changed to "Chosen" (again), some figures amended or updated, and "neighbour" has been changed to "neighbor". The most substantial change is a deletion from the Ainu section of a paragraph on the theory that Ainu constitute a "racial island" (page 37). Deleted content is shown with
Immediately following the above overview is the same table as was published in the 1936 yearbook, showing the "Population of Japan Proper by Different Nationalities" based on the 1930 census. The terminology and figures are identical (see 1936 yearbook) TerritoriesChosenThe most interest changes in usage are seen in the chapter on "Chosen (Korea)". The article titled "Origin of the Korean Race" in the 1936 edition is now "Origin of the Native Race". More signifantly, all instances of "Korea" and "Korean" and "Koreans" have been changed to "Chosen" or "Chosenese". The distinction made in the 1936 edition between "Korea" before annexation and "Chosen" after annexation has been lost. What had been called the "the Bank of Korea" in 1909 and "the Bank of Chosen" after annexation have been conflated. And the conflation shows that the brains of the clerks charged with the task of mechanically replacing "Korea" with "Chosen" must have been totally numb. Here is what the text in the 1936 yearbook (pages 1078-1079) looks like in the 1940-1941 edition (page 869).
Chosenese originsHere is what the same mind did with the "racial origin" paragraph -- also showing how the text in the 1936 yearbook (page 1070) looks in the 1940-1941 edition (page 861). Deleted content is shown with
TaiwanThe populations of "Taiwan (Formosa)" as of the end of 1935, 1936, 1937, and 1938 are statistically broken down as follows (page 882). Note that "Koreans" have become "Chosenese". Japanese Chosenese Natives Aboriginal savages Chinese Foreigners Total Whereas the 1934 data shown in the 1936 yearbook included "Aboriginal savages" in the "Natives" figure -- and also showed their population separately -- the 1940-1941 edition shows "Aboriginal savages" excluded from "Natives" in 1935 and 1936, and -- apparently -- combined with "Chinese" and "Foreigners" from 1937. From 1937, it appears that "Aboriginal savages, Chinese, and Foreigners" are combined. The "Chinese" would have been those on Taiwan in 1895 who chose to remain Chinese nationality rather than become Japanese under the terms of the Treaty of Shimonoseki -- and Chinese who arrived after this date who had not naturalized -- in other words, foreigners of Chinese nationality. The savages are still savages. But separate figures on savages stop from 1937 (page 882). 1935 1936 1937 1938 Japanese 269,798 282,012 299,280 208,845 Chosenese 1,604 1,694 1,985 1,903 Natives 4,990,131 5,108,914 5,261,404 5,392,806 Aboriginal savages 50,489 152,350 ┐ Chinese 53,900 59,015 ├ 46,373 43,405 Foreigners 209 228 ┘ Total 5,315,642 5,451,863 5,609,042 5,746,959 Note that "Japanese" is more properly "Interiorites" -- since Chosense, Natives, and Aboriginal savages are also Japanese. Note also that "Foreigners" is more properly "Other foreigners" -- in addition to Chinese. The "natural" increase in Natives from 1936 to 1937 is somewhat higher than expected -- but not nearly high enough to account for inclusion of Aboriginal savages. Moreover, the figures shown in 1937 and 1938, apparently representing Aboriginal savages, Chinese, and [other] Foreigners, are less than one one-fourth the expected figures -- and more on the order of what one would expect if the Chinese population had started to leave Taiwan for the continuent after the spread of hostilities there. The text states that "Including the savages, the total population at the end of 1938 in Taiwan was 5,746,959" (page 882, underscoring mine)." The underscored phrase is odd because, according to the table, the savages are obviously included. At least it would appear that the savages are included. In fact, the "Aboriginal savages" counts for 1935 and 1936 are not reflected in the totals -- because they are included in the "Natives" figures -- as they were in a similar table for 1934 data in the 1936 yearbook (see above). The table thus seriously misrepresents the data. The manner of misrepresentation is clearer in comparision with similar data in the 1936 yearbook (see able), and in the 1943-1944 yearbook (see below). Karafuto"Japanese" and "Chosenese" populations have increased in the territory (page 903). The "Population by Race or Nationality" of Karafuto was as follows, as of the end of 1938 -- which means that the figures are based on domicile registers, not national census data (page 1126). Population by Race or Nationality Japanese 329,743 Chosenese 7,625 Taiwanese 3 Ainu 1,274 Other Natives 374 Foreigners 338 Total 339,357 The differentiation of "Ainu" from "Japanese" registers probably means that the registers of Karafuto Ainu have not yet been integrated with "Japan proper" (naichi, prefectural) registers. China AffairIn a special section between Manchoukuo and the Appendix -- sandwiched between blue leaves -- is a section on "China" (pages 991-1062). The section begins with the disclaimer -- in parentheses -- that "Mentions are limited to those subjects in which Japan has special interest" (page 991). The first part concerns "Area and Population" and begins with this paragraph (page 991). Area and Population Owing to the lack of scientifically compiled statistics it is difficult to grasp the actual size of the territory and the population of China. The ambiguity of the international position is also in some way responsible, for in many cases, the Chinese make their calculations with Manchuria and Outer Mongolia still considered as integral parts of China while both of them are clearly independent of the Chinese Republic. As regards the various divisions and separations which have occurred from the political viewpoint following the outbreak of the China Affair, however, it would be more convenient to keep them out of consideration because the vents closely associated with the occurrence are still in progress. Wang Ching-wei governmentThe "China Affair" reflects 支那事変 (Shina jihen), which is what Japan called what Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang government in Chungking (Chongqing) regarded as the second "Sino-Japanese War". Japan was not in fact at war with "China" -- at least not with "The New Central Government of the Chinese Republic" (pages 1004-1005). The New Central Government of the Chinese Republic Wang Ching-wei, the former President of the Executive Yuan and Foreign Minister of the Chungking Government, who had expressed his ideals for peace, left Chungking on his own accord on December 18, 1938 accompanied by colleagues, and took refuge at Hanoi. On July 10, 1939, Wang publicly renounced all relations with Chiang Kai-shek, and on August 9, broadcasted from Canton on "How to Bring About Peace in China." Later on numerous occasions, he issued statements in regard to the designs to institute peace in China in a firm conviction and belief on Japan's policies enunciated in the Konoe statements in November and December, 1938. Wang Ching-wei's peace movement steadily progressed during the latter half of 1939 with the full support of Japanese authorities in China and Tokyo. A seven-day conference (January 23-29, 1940) was held at Tsingtao between Wang and delegates from the provisional governments in Nanking and Peking. The conferees agreed to unite the three elements and organize a new central government at Nanking to save China from destruction and adjust relations with Japan for permanent peace. This led to the formal foundation of a new Central Government of China in Nanking on 30 March 1940. Fall of NankingA long section on "Sino-Japanese Hostilities in 1937-1940" includes this description of Chinese loses in fall of Nanking, which "marked the completion of the first stage of the China Affair" (page 1054). Occupation of Nanking and Hangchow [ First two graphs omitted. ] On December 17,1937, Prince Asaka as well as General Matsui, the then supreme commander of the Japanese forces in Central China, and Admiral Hasegawa, commander of the Japanese squadron operating in Chinese waters, took part in the triumphal entry of the walled town of Nanking. The offensive was launched on December 22 against Hangchow which the Japanese forces captured without losing a single soldier. The Chinese sustained enormous losses in the Nanking battle, leaving 53,874 dead behind them when they were routed. [ Rest of graph itemizes the military "booty" taken by Japanese forces. ] John Gunther on NankingJohn Gunther, in Inside Asia (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1938), wrote this about Nanking (page 35). In a recent Japan Times I saw an editorial note to the effect that 300,000 Chinese troops were surrounded. "It is the intention of the Japanese forces," the story said, "to kill all the trapped Chinese." With my own eyes I have seen irritated Japanese soldiers -- men in uniform, presumably disciplined -- slap Chinese women, kick old men, and slam coolies on the head with bamboo poles. When the Japanese took Nanking, forty thousand Chinese -- many of them civilians -- are said to have been executed, and several thousand women raped. China Information Committee on NankingThe introduction to an original pamphlet I have called Pictorial Evidence of Japanese Atrocities, published circa 1938 by The China Information Committee (Hankow, China, 18 pages), says this about the numbers (page 1). The majority of the illustrations [photographs in this pamphlet] were taken many days after the fall of the Chinese capital [of Nanking and on 12 December 1937] which began the weeks of horror during which some 60,000 Japanese soldiers ran amok in an orgy of unrestrained killing, raping, torturing, burning and looting. Foreign missionaries and medical men have estimated that during this period between 15,000 and 20,000 girls and women were raped with fiendish brutality; that very many were killed because they were strong enough to resist outrage, and that tens of thousands of civilian men and young children were shot, drowned, or beaten to death. Foreign journalists assessed that fully 15,000 unarmed Chinese soldiers who had cast off their uniforms and sought sanctuary in the refugee zones, were massacred along with batches of noncombatant Nanking police and uniformed Postal employees. So here we have the "high" and "low" counts that today so many people dispute, depending on their approach to truth. |
1943-1944 Japan Year Book | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Foreign Affairs Association of Japan Facsimile editionThis is a facsimile edition manufactured by the United States government during the war. The usual advertisesments that precede and follow the the main pages of such yearbooks have been omitted. "RESTRICTED" appears in the upper-right corner of the cover, top center of the title page, and bottem center of the first page of the main text. The front matter begins with the title page. It appears to have been reset. The title and publisher appear as usual. Between the two, however, is the attribution "Republished by the Interdepartmental Committe for the Acquisition of Foreign Publications". The Preface, Contents, and main body are apparently facsimilies of the original pages. At the bottom of the last page of the contents is the notice "Accompanied with "The South Seas Handbook, 1943-44". Apparently there was a supplement but it is missing. Erroneous colophonThe last page shows a composite of the original Japanese colophon with an English summary above it. The Japanese colophon shows the same title and publisher as in earlier editions. The edition was printed on 5 December and published on 21 December 1943. The editor was 高垣勣次郎 (Takagaki Sekijiro). The printing was done by 日本タイムス社 (Nippon Taimusu Sha). At the very bottom of the page is "☆ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1945 -- O-645-195". The English summary of states "Edited by Sekijiro Takagai, The Foreign Affairs Association of Japan" and gives publisher's address. However, it errs in stating that yearbook was "Printed and published in Japan by Shinzo Kuromiya, The Japan Times, Ltd." The English summary also gives the wrong addresses. The Japanese address for the Foreign Affairs Association is "Tokyo-to, Kojimachi-ku, Uchisaiwai-cho 2-1, Osaka biru" (transleration). The address of the Nippon Times printing division is "Tokyo-to, Kojimachi-ku, Uchiaiwai-cho 2-22" (translation). In the English summary, the cho and chome parts become respectively "1 Uchisaiwai-cho 2-chome" and "1 Uchisaiwai-cho 1-chome". "Japan Times" is also the wrong name for the newspaper company at this time. In January 1943, the year this volume was published, "Japan" (ジャパン) became "Nippon" (日本) in both the name of the company and the paper. "The Nippon Times" did not revert to "The Japan Times" until July 1956. ProvenanceHandwritten inside the front cover of the copy in my library is "Intelligence Services Staff / Microfilm and Foreign Publications Unit / Room 502 / No. 19". Opposite, on the fly, in a different hand and color of ink, is a man's name and a Washington, D.C. street address. I purchased it from an antiquarian book dealer in North Hatfield, Massachusetts, in 2007. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PopulationThere is a significant shift in terminology from "Japan" and "Japanese" to "Nippon" and "Nipponese" in what is now "Races of the Empire". Throughout this edition -- except, ironically, in its title and preface, and in very few instances elsewhere -- the country is Nippon those who are affiliated with "Nippon Proper" are "Nipponese". Whereas earlier editions referred to "His Imperial Majesty HIROHITO" as the "Emperor of Japan", this edition calls him "Tenno of Nippon". Here is the 1936 version showing the 1940-1941 revisions in bold blue and the 1943-1944 revisions in bold purple. Deleted content is shown with
Nippon Proper by nationalitiesNot only have "Japan" and "Japanese" become "Nippon" and "Nipponese" -- but since "Korea" has already become "Chosen", it makes sense to change "Koreans" to "Chosenese". The table of figures in earlier editions showing a breakdown of 1920 and 1930 census figures for the prefectural population by nationality remains the same -- in all but following respects (page 30, figures and other unrelated headings have been omitted).
TerritoriesThe prospect of replacing all mentions of "Japan" and "Japanese" by "Nippon" and "Nipponese" -- and of "Emperor" by "Tenno" -- must have been overwhelming. In fact, most instances of these now less favored terms remain in the 1943-1944 edition -- even in its title. ChosenWhereas "Korea" and Koreans" became "Chosen" and "Chosenese" throughout the "Chosen (Korea)" chapter in the 1940-1941 yearbook, "Japan" and "Japanese" did not become "Nippon" and "Nipponese" in this chapter of the 1943-1944 edition. The "Bank of Chosen" remains inexplicably renamed "the Bank of Chosen" in this edition -- as it was in the 1940-1941 yearbook. TaiwanThe populations of "Taiwan (Formosa)" as of the end of 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, and 1940 are statistically broken down as follows (page 919). Note that "Koreans" have become "Chosenese". Japanese The order of "Foreigners" and "Chinese" has been reversed -- for a reason. The two cohorts are combined from 1937. Figures for "Aboriginal savages" are not shown from 1937 -- again for a reason. The savages are still savages. But in the table in this 1943-1944 edition of yearbook, they represented somewhat differently than they in similar tables in the 1934 and 1940-1941 yearbooks (see above) (page 919). 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 Japanese 282,012 299,280 208,845 323,148 346,663 Chosenese 1,694 1,985 1,903 2,260 2,299 Natives 5,108,914 5,261,404 5,392,806 5,524,990 5,692,233 Aboriginal savages 152,350 Foreifiners [sic] 228 ┬ 46,373 43,405 45,466 46,190 Chinese 59,015 ┘ Total 5,451,863 5,609,042 5,746,959 5,895,864 6,077,385 The text states that "the foreigners are mostly Chinese (45,367 at the end of 1940)" and observes that "Including the savages, the census population on October 1, 1940 in Taiwan was 5,872,084" (page 919, underscoring mine). The inversion of the order of "Chinese / Foreigners" to "Foreigners / Chinese" was done to facilitate the inclusion of "Chinese" in "Foreigners" -- since, in fact, "Chinese / Foreigners" actually meant "Chinese / [Other] Foreigners". The underscored phrase "Including the savages" leaves unexplained the fact that the "Aboriginal savages" count in the 1936 data is not included in the total -- because the "Natives" figure includes "Aboriginal savages". In other words, just as "Chinese" is a subcategory of "Foreigner", "Aboriginal savages" is a subcategory of "Natives" -- "Natives" meaning not "indigenous" or "aboriginal" people, but "islanders" -- meaning Taiwanese -- meaning people affiliated with Taiwan by family registration. "Japanese" is an English racialism for "Naichijin" (内地人) meaning "Interiorites" in contemporary Japanese publications on Taiwan. The English terms "Natives" and "Aboriginal savages" also misrepresent contemporary Japanese expressions. Karafuto"Japanese" and "Chosenese" populations have continued to increase in the territory. The "Population by Race or Nationality" of Karafuto was as follows, as of the end of 1940 (page 935).
Population by Race or Nationality
Japanese 382,056 Chosenese 16,056 Taiwanese 1 Natives 406 Foreigners 319 Total 398,838 "Ainu" have vanished from Karafuto population figures for 1940, presumably because all Karafuto Ainu registers have been mainstreamed with "Japan proper" (naichi, prefectural) registers. The "Japanese" and "Chosenese" populations on Karafuto at the end of 1938 (1940-1941 yearbook) were 319,743 and 7,625. The increase in the "Chosenese" figure probably reflects the beginning in 1939 of more aggressive, sometimes coercive recruiting of Chosen subjects as laborers. Most interior (naichi, prefectural) subjects are migrating to Karafuto as settlers or laborers. The following article on "Education of the Natives" remains (page 942). Education of the Natives There are some 2,000 natives in Karafuto including the Ainus, Gilyaks, Orochones and Tunguses. The Karafuto government is undertaking to educate the children of these backward natives. At the educational institution established at Shisuka-machi, about 35 children of the natives are taught along the line of the primary school. This is a verbatim carryover from both the 1936 yearbook (page 1137) and the 1940-1941 yearbook (page 911). The only change is the number of children increased from 30 in the 1936 account to 35 in the 1940-1941 and 1943-1944 accounts. Unification of the EmpireAmong the most remarkable developments in Japan during the war were the sweeping reforms of government administration undertaken to stretch the empire's bureaucratic resources into the newly occupied territories. That, at least, was one of the pretexts for the reforms undertaken in the fall of 1942, not yet a year after the attack on Pearl Harbor, which perhaps there was more optimism that Japan would actually succeed in its mission to drive Euro-American colonial interests out of Asia. The territory that was to integrated into a single "Nippon proper" consisted of the territory of Japan as of 8 December 1941, the day Japan declared war on the United States and the British Empire. This meant the so-called interior (prefectures, Nippon proper) and the exterior (Taiwan, Karafuto, and Chosen). It was time for these four entities to become one, because their "races" had been "completely assimilated in all things Nipponese". Karafuto was the first to be incorporated into the interior. Taiwan and Chosen would have followed had the "brilliant war results" not become otherwise. The following account comes 1943-1944 edition of the Japan Yearbook (pages 120-121, bold emphasis added).
Karafuto's integration into the interiorThe most important change for Karafuto was its integration into the prefectural system in the spring of 1943 -- in time for inclusion of the following statement. Here is the entire "Legal System and Status" section of the 1936 yearbook (page 1136) showing changes in the 1940-1941 edition (page 910), and the lead paragraph of the entirely new and expanded content of the 1943-1944 edition (page 943).
East Asiatic New OrderThe 1940-41 edition had a special section on "China" between Manchoukuo and the Appendix. This edition has -- after Manchoukuo -- a section on "China" and a section called "Progress of East Asiatic New Order". ChinaThe section on "China" (pages 979-1012) covers China's entry into the Greater East Asia on 9 January 1943 "when the National Government of China under President Wang Ching-wei declared war on the United States and Britain" (page 983). The text of the declaration is shown to be signed by Wang Chao-ming (汪兆銘 Wang Zhaoming, aka 汪精衛 Wang Ching-wei, Wang Jingwei, 1883-1944) on 9 January of the 32nd Year of Minkuo era (1943). The Joint Sino-Nippon Declaration, the Retrocession of Concessions and Relinquishment of Extraterritoriality, Purpose of Wang's Visit to Japan Revealed, Treaties with U.S. and Britain Repudiated, Sino-Japanese Pact of Alliance including text, statement by Prime Minister Tojo, and address by President Wang Ching-wei -- et cetera. Progress of East Asiatic New OrderThis section includes "The Birth of New Burma" (1013-1026), "The Independence of the Philippines" (1026-1048), and "The Assembly of Greater East Asiatic Nations (1049-1076). The latter includes the "Joint Declaration Adopted on November 6, 1943" in Tokyo by representatives of "the six independent nations of Japan, China, Thailand, Manchoukuo, the Philippines, and Burma". AppendixThe appendix consists of the following three items. Sweeping Victory of the Imperial Navy in the Solomons The Constitution The Imperial House Law List of Emperors In previous editions, the appendix began with the Constitution, and the List of Emperors was followed by many other features. Here all the other features have been cut. And the "sweeping victory" in a battle that took place in November 1943 is exaggerated to the point of tragedy. Ethnological origins of
|
Outline of prehistory in 1936, 1940-41, 1943-44, and 1946-48, and 1949-52 yearbooks |
|||||
1936 yearbook (page 80) |
1940-41 yearbook (pages 53-55) |
||||
OUTLINE OF HISTORY |
OUTLINE OF THE CULTURAL HISTORY OF
OUTLINE OF JAPAN'S |
||||
Ethnological Beginnings According to modern scientific research it seems almost certain that Japanese tribes lived on these Islands at least as early as 2,000 B.C., in the latter part of the New Stone Age. It seems probable that yellow folk from the mainland of Asia, the natives of some southern islands, and possibly some kind of white-skinned race from the northwest, drifted to the Japanese islands, where they found a milder climate and more fertile soil than in their homelands, and formed a mixed race which we may call the Yamato Tribe and their blood became so well blended in the course of time that many think the Japanese people, their descendants, to be homogenous. They lived mostly on seashores or riversides. Their shell-mounds are rich in relics of those early days. They dug caves in the hillsides and pits in the flat ground for their dwellings, used stone tools and lived on natural food such as game, fish and shell-fish. In the 3rd century B.C. the Indo-Chinese brought rice to the islands and the natives learned to cultivate and eat it. By this time a primitive agricultural life must have begun, and according to one of the oldest Chinese records on Japan the islanders already had a knowledge of silk-making even in such a remote period. Four different styles of clothing seem to have been prevalent, that of the Ainu, Tunguse, Indo-Chinese and Huns respectively, although there were some tribes who went naked. Judging by the clay images or idols they left behind them, the Ainu clothes consisted of an upper and lower garment, the upper garment of the women being open in front, while that of the men was not. The dress on the Tunguse much resembled the Korean in style and they were fond of using jewels or stone ornaments. They lived in groups, forming villages which consisted in some cases of several hundred households. They seem to have had a primitive communal life, each tribe or group being firmly united by ties of blood and belief. But there had appeared as yet no political organization or system and there was a continual stream of immigrants from the continent. Clan and tribal fighting and alliances gave opportunity for mixing blood. By the beginning of the Christian Era the Ainu and the ancestors of the Japanese, mainly Tunguse by descent, gradually settled down on the islands, the former living in the north-eastern half and the latter spreading over the south-western half.
Age of Traditions
|
* In this chapter, the year number is of the era of Nippon which began in 660 B.C., unless it is specially indicated as the Christian era.
OLD JAPAN Land and Inhabitants Regarding the origin of this country the mythological legends tell us that ages ago, the first ancestral deity of the Imperial Family gave birth to the "Amaterasu-Omikami Ninigi-no-Mikoto, with five gods accompanying, came from the heavens, down to Takachiho Hill of Hyuga province in Kyushu. His great-grandson was no other than Kamu-Yamato-Iwarehiko-no Mikoto or Jimmu Tenno, the founder and the first Tenno of the Empire of According to geological, palaeontological and other scientific researches, the Since their formation the
Relics of the Early Neolithic Culture
Culture of Ancient
|
Korea, China and Japan Nippon
The "Nara Period (710-793)" has a section called "Korea, China, and Japan" (660 B.C. - 1019 A.D.)" while the "Muromachi Period (1338-1602)" has a section section called just "Korea, China, and Japan". Here I have reproduced the Nara section, it lays the foundation for Japan's policies in Korea, China, and even Manchuria.
The Muromachi section deals with the Yuan (Mongol) invasion in the 13th century, trade with the Mings (Ming China) from the 15th century, and Korea's suppression of Japanese pirates in the 14th century. Hideyoshi's "expedition to Korea" in the 1590s is discussed in other parts of the yearbooks.
China, Korea, and Japan in 1936, 1940-41, and 1943-44 yearbooks |
|
1936 yearbook (page 87-88) |
|
Nara
Korea, China and The northern part of Korea had once been a territory of China in the second century B.C. Intercourse between the In 607 A.D., when Shotoku Taishi was regent, an ambassador was sent to the Sui Dynasty and friendly official intercourse was opened. Later, when the Tang Dynasty replaced the Sui, diplomatic relations were still unbroken between the two nations and many a young man and monk went to China for study. The culture and civilization of the continent and civilization of the continent flowed into In Manchuria a strong nation appeared in 713 A.D. and invaded northern Korea, and started some trade with
|
Social classes in the Heian period
The "Heian Age (974-1192)" section in the 1936 edition ends with a subsection called "Economic Condition". The 1940-41 edition has a subsection called "Social Classes" in the Asuka, Heian, Muromachi, and Yedo periods.
Here is the section on "Social Classes (the 7th-12th centuries)" in the Heian-period section of the 1940-41 edition, showing the changes made in the 1943-44 edition. The 1946-48 edition has the same text as the 1943-44 edition except that "Nippon" has been changed back to "Japan".
Descendants of Korean slaves of as ancestors of Eta in the Yedo period |
|
1940-41 yearbook (pages 65-66) |
|
Héian Period Social Classes (the 7th-12th centuries A.D.) The highest class of this age consisted of the descendants of the nobles of the preceding age, new dignitaries promoted for meritorious services, descendants of the Imperial House and high priests of Buddhist temples. These people monopolized the highest positions in the government and administration. Wealth was naturally accumulated by them and civilized life attained by the assimilation of continental culture was theirs. The high official positions and ranks were accompanied with material estates and income, and nobility and wealth were synonymous. Living in the capital or vicinity and holding a close connection with the Imperial House this class enjoyed its aristocratic life until power was taken from it by the Fujiwaras in the 11th century (A.D.). Next came the class of provincial lords, or officials, scholars, warriors and certain naturalized Koreans or Chinese [Note 1] who were well educated. This class can be compared with the middle class of to-day. The power of the members of this class in politics was secondary, but the standard of their culture was as high as the first, if not higher, especially in the case of scholars such as doctors, astronomers, and mathematicians. They were the military and civil administrators in the local districts and the carriers of a higher civilization. The third class of this age consisted of the descendants of the second and third classes of the preceding age, and they were mostly engaged in agricultural work, although there were among them some artisans and merchants but The lowest class of people, practically a slave class, consisted of two kinds of people. The first were the workers for the Court, the clothes, paper and furniture makers, musicians, stable-men, etc. They were mostly naturalized Koreans, and because of their tribal origin were despised by the other classes. Part of them seem to have been the forefathers of the "Eta" class of the Yédo Period. But they must have already belonged to the lower class in their native land, Korea, or may have been captives there, because there were many naturalized Koreans who occupied honorable positions in the Imperial Court and in the second class mentioned above. According to a record of this period there were but 4,216 households almost all of which were in the Kyoto, Nara and Osaka districts. So far as the national law is concerned these slaves were freed several times, in The descendants of the "Yakko" [Note 2] of the preceding periods formed the second division of this slave class. Their social standard as such was legalized by the laws issued at the time of the Taika Reformation. The Taiho laws prohibited intermarriage between members of the "disgraceful" class and members of the "good" classes [Note 3]. Slaves who belonged to offices mainly worked as tomb keepers, farm workers and miscellaneous jobbers, while those owned by private houses did the dirtiest work. The number of these slaves comprised 10 per cent of the entire population. The average value of a slave in the Nara Period was 1,000 bundles of rice for a man and 800 bundles for a woman which meant the amount of rice which would feed a person for 2,500 days. This was rather a prohibitive price for the purchase of slaves, probably due to the small supply of slaves against the demand, the treatment of them by their masters was, therefore, very humane. In the Héian Period, the slave system underwent a gradual change, there was laxity in the imposition of the old laws pertaining to the system, and intermarriage with the "good" people often occurred. On the other hand, many of the third class people or oppressed farmers had become reduced to serfdom, and their intermingling with this class made the two classes indistinguishable at the latter half of the Héian Period.
|
Before and after Jinmu
The 1936 and 1940-1941 editions of this yearbook series used Christian era B.C. and A.D. years throughout. The 1943-1944 edition also used B.J. and A.J. or "Before Jimmu" and "After Jimmu" Imperial era years (page 85).
In the main text, this edition uses Imperial era years throughout the "Outline of the Cultural History of Nippon" but Christian era years in most other parts, including the "List of Emperors" in the Appendix. In the "Chronicle" it uses Imperial era years for "NIPPON" events and Christian era years for "THE WORLD" events.
Here is how the same paragraph from from the the 1940-1941 and 1943-1944the history sections reads in both editions.
Mapping history from Christian to Imperial coordinates |
|
1940-41 yearbook (pages 81-82) |
1943-44 yearbook (page 67) |
Yédo Period Opening of the Country The Government appointed a commissioner to administer foreign affairs in 1858, and the Shogun sought the Imperial sanction for the provisional treaties, and finally got it in 1865. The carrying into practice of all these treaties was realized with the opening of Hyogo (Kobé) port in 1867, the year of the accession of the Emperor Meiji. In the meantime, several international troubles occurred. Russia tried to invade Tsushima in 1861, Satsuma warriors fought against an English fleet off Kagoshima in 1863, and the Nagato clan had an engagement with the combined fleets of France, England, Holland, and America at Shimonoséki in 1864. |
Yédo Period Opening of the Country The Government appointed a commissioner to administer foreign affairs in 2518, and the Shogun sought the Imperial sanction for the provisional treaties, and finally got it in 2525. The carrying into practice of all these treaties was realized with the opening of Hyogo (Kobé) port in 2527, the year of the accession of the Meiji Tenno. In the meantime, several international troubles occurred. Russia tried to invade Tsushima in 2521, Satsuma warriors fought against an English fleet off Kagoshima in 2523, and the Nagato clan had an engagement with the combined fleets of France, England, Holland, and America at Shimonoséki in 2524. |
Chronicle, 1937-1946
Here is a selection of just a few of the events chronicled in the 1943-44 and 1946-48 yearbooks. [Bracketed events and information] in the section from the 1943-44 edition are from the 1946-48 edition. I have focused on relations between Japan and China.
Chronicle The Japan Year Book, 1943-1944 |
|
2597 NIPPON |
1937 THE WORLD |
The China Affair, July 7. Occupation of Shanghai by the Nipponese forces, November 10. Fall of Nanking, December 13. The Kuomintang Government removed to Hankow. |
The Kuomintang Government removed to Chungking, Nov. 16. |
2598 NIPPON |
1938 THE WORLD |
The Renovation Government of the Republic of China founded at Nanking, March 28. Wang Ching-wei, Vice-President of the Kuomintang and Chairman of the National Administrative Advisory Council leaves Chungking, Dec. 18. Wang Ching-wei issues a peace statement at Hanoi, Dec. 30. |
|
2599 NIPPON |
1939 THE WORLD |
Hainan Island surprised by the forcible landing of Nipponese forces, Feb. 10. Spratley Islands put under jurisdiction of Taiwan Government-General, March 30. |
|
2600 NIPPON |
1940 THE WORLD |
The formal celebration and banquet in commemoration of the 2600th anniverasy of the founding of the Empire [of Japan, Nov. 10.] Conclusion of the Treaty concerning the Basic Relations between Nippon and China, Nov. 30. |
The Central Government of the Republic of China re-established at Nanking under the leadership of Wang Ching-wei, March 30. |
2601 NIPPON |
1941 THE WORLD |
Nippon declares war against the United States and the British Empire on December 8, and Imperial forces attack Hawaii, Singapore, Hong Kong, the Philippines and other places. Beginning of the Greater East Asia War. |
The United States, Britain, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands East Indies, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Chungking and Cuba declare war on Nippon, December 8. Bold in original. December 8 Tokyo time was December 7 Hawaii time. |
2602 NIPPON |
1942 THE WORLD |
President Wang Ching-wei's visit, December 20-27. |
The National Government of China promulgates the revised Temporary Currency Adjustment Law which provides for the suspension of the linking system at per between the Central Reserve Bank of China notes and the Chungking currency on and after April 1, 1942, March 30. President Wang Ching-wei of China arrives at Hsinking to further consolidate the amicable bond binding China and Manchoukuo, May 7. The National Government of China decides to eliminate the Chungking currency from Central China, May 27. |
2603 NIPPON |
1943 THE WORLD |
Abolition of extra-territorial rights of the Japanese in China and retrocession of concessions and international settlements in China by Japan, January 9. Premier Tojo enunciates in his speech before the 81st Session of the Imperial Diet Japan's intentions to recognize the creation of the Independent Burmese State in this year, January 28. The fulfilment of Japan's retrocession of concessions and relinquishment of extra-territorial rights in China, March 30. An agreement pertaining to the retrocessions [retrocession] to China of the International Settlement of Shanghai is signed at Nanking, June 30. The Chosenese are given privilege of entering military service, August 1. The "Tei-A Maru" leaves Yokohama for the second exchange of Japanese and American people interned in the respective countries, September 14. [ Following items from the 1946-48 edition. ] [The exchange of Japanese and American nationals who were brought to Murmagao by the "Tei-A Maru" and the "Gripsholm" respectively completed, Oct. 19.] [The Conclusion of a Pact between the Japanese Government and the Nanking Government under Wang Ching-wei on Oct. 30.] |
The Nanking Government [under Wang Ching-wei] declares war on the United States and the British Empire, January 9. Violent demonstrations against the Negroes rage in Detroit, the United States, June 20. The declaration of Independence of Burma and the conclusion of Japan-Burma Alliance, August 1. The Independence of the Philippines, October 14. |
Chronicle The Japan Year Book, 1946-1948 |
|
1944 JAPAN |
1944 THE WORLD |
Wang Ching-wei of the Naking Government of China passes away in Nagoya, Nov. 10. |
|
1945 JAPAN |
1945 THE WORLD |
Japanese forces in Iwojima make their last charge, Mar. 17. The U.S. forces begin landing on the main island of Okinawa, Apr. 1. An atomic bomb attack on Hiroshima, Aug. 6 An Imperial Rescript issued announcing the end of the war, Aug. 14. Japan signs the instrument of surrenders aboard the Battleship Missouri, Sept. 2. |
The proclamation of independence of Annam, Mar. 11. The Kingdom of Cambodia proclaims independence, Mar. 13. The Kingdom of Luang-Prabang in Indo-China declares its independence, Apr. 8. The Italian government declares war on Japan, July 14. A joing declaration of the unconditional surrender of Japan issued by the U.S.A., Britain and China at Potsdam, July 25. The Soviet Union declares war against Japan, Aug. 8. The Kurile Islands occupied by the Soviet Army, Sept. 1. |
1946 JAPAN |
1946 THE WORLD |
The Revised Japanese Constitution Drafted announced by the Japanese government, Mar. 6. |
Chen Kung-po, former President of the Nanking regime, given death sentence on charges of treason, Apr. 12. Dr. Chu Min-yi, former foreign Minister of the Nanking regime, given death sentence by the Kiangsu Supreme Court, and Mrs. Wang-Ching-Wei the sentence of life-imprisonment, Apr. 22. |
1946-1948 Japan Year Book | ||
The Japan Year Book, 1946-48 ColophonThis edition was printed on 15 February and published on 28 February 1949. The colophon shows that Helen M. Uno (宇野滿壽子 Uno Masuko) was both the editor and the publisher (編集兼発行人). Uno was affiliated with the Foreign Affairs Association, which published this edition. It was printed by Aikodo, a printing company in Kanda. Uno was apparently still affiliated with the Foreign Affairs Association, translated Muragaki Norimasa, Kokai nikki: The Diary of the First Japanese Embassy to the United States of America (Tokyo: Foreign Affairs Association of Japan, 1958). AppendixThe appendix includes a lot of very important material divided into the following categories. Directives of the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers (1-23) Foreign Affairs Association of JapanBy this time the Foreign Affairs Association is located at Chiyoda-ku, Yurakucho 1-7. This was in the vicinity of the present-day Yurakucho Denki Building, just west of JR Yurakucho station, a couple of blocks from the Hibiya intersection and MacArthur's GHQ/SCAP in the Dai-Ichi Seimei Building, which immediately faced the Imperial Palace and moat. The association's office is there because that part of Tokyo was not bombed. Printed at the very bottom of the colophon of the 1946-1948 edition of the yearbook is "Made in Occupied Japan". The Foreign Affairs Association of Japan had published many books and pamphlets in English that essentially sought to vindicate Japan's actions in Manchuria and China. The association also published a journal called Contemporary Japan, which had a run of twenty-nine volumes from 1932 to 1970. Some bibliographers of English-language "Japanese propaganda" consider the Foreign Affairs Association of Japan to be a "middle ground" conveyor of pro-Japan viewpoints. Volume 7 (From the middle ground, 1936-1938) in Series 2 (Pamphlets, 1891-1939) of Peter O'Connor's Japanese Propaganda: Selected Readings (Tokyo: Edition Synapse, 2005) consists entirely of the following pamphlets published by the association in the late 1930s. 1936 The Significance of the China Affair (Ohta Sabroh) After the war, the association published pamphlets and books like these, among others.
1952 Bonkei: Japanese Tray Landscapes (Alfred Koehn) |
||
PopulationHere are two versions of the 1946-1948 description of the "Races of the Country" -- the first as published, the second showing its derivation from early editions (page 26).
The "impure" JapaneseIt is no longer just "Japanese" who mostly inhabit the prefectures but "the pure Japanese". Nothing is said, anywhere, about "Taiwanese" or "Chosenese" who are in "the country" at the time. ForeignersTaiwanese and Chosenese are not listed among the "Foreigners residing in Japan at the end of the Pacific War August 1945" (pages 35-36). Great Britain, The U.S.(Including the Philippines), and Soviet Russia are included in the "Country" list -- but not China. White RussiansThe last "Country" category is "People without domicile (White Russians)" -- of which there are 585. This is the second largest following Germany (2,741), and is followed by France (402) and Italy (380) -- among 5,991 foreigners. The "White Russian" category appears to be entirely new to the yearbook. RepatriationA table shows the "Number of the Japanese overseas at the time of the cessation of hostilities" to total 7,076,174 as of 25 September 1945 according to the Navy Ministry (pages 36-37). Saghalien Island, The Kurile Islands, Manchuria, and Korea head the list, with Formosa further down. The figures are broken down by Navy, Army, and Civilian. Several other tables show the numbers of Japanese awaiting repatriation and already repatriated, as of various dates in 1946 and 1947 (pages 37-39). The Kurile Islands, Saghalien Island, and Korea head these lists -- with Manchuria and Formosa further down. Koreans and Taiwanese by any name simply disappear. "Japan" without Taiwan, Karafuto, and KoreaThe appendix includes two GHQ/SCAP directives concerning the administrative separation of certain outlaying areas from Japan (Appendix, pages 20-21). These directives defined "Japan" for purposes of administering the territories that had once been part of the Empire of Japan. See "Japan" and "Japanese": How JCS and SCAP redefined the Empire of Japan for transcriptions of both directives. Laws and ordinancesThis thickest part of the Appendix, which follows the Constitution of Japan, begins with the Imperial House Law and ends with the Unemployed [Unemployment] Insurance Law. Partial amendements to the Civil Code, and revisions of the Census [Family] Registration Law, are included. The new Natioanlity Law is yet to come. An Alien Registration Ordinance has been enacted, but it is not mentioned. Documentary materialDocumentary material begins with Cairo Declaration and ends with the full text of the indictment against 28 military and political leaders of Japan, as presented on 29 April 1946 to the International Military Tribunal for the Far East. There are also English versions of Imperial Rescript of 15 August 1945 concerning surrender, and the Imperial Rescript of 1 January 1946 concerning "ficitious ideas that the emperor is manifest god and that the Japanese people are a race superior to other races and therefore destined to rule the world" (page 281). |
1949-1952 Japan Year Book | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Japan Year Book, 1949-52 ColophonThe colophon of this edition, unlike that of the 1946-48 edition, is in English only and lacks the usual details of Japanese-language colophons. It is said to have been "Edited and Published by Helen M. Uno, The Foreign Affairs Association of Japan". The "August 31, 1952" appears to be the date of publication. No information is given about the printer. The editor's foreword states that this edition was "unduly delayed because of difficulties in printing". Perhaps. Possibly the printing was delayed to enable publication after the end of the Occupation -- to celebrate the end of the Occupation, and to obviate a repetition of the "Made in Occupied Japan" notice that had appeared at the bottom of the 1946-48 colophon. Paper qualityThe quality of the boards and the binding of the 1949-52 edition is the same as that of the 1946-48 edition. The 1949-52 edition was sold in a heavy box with a proper lid. Some earlier editions may have been sold in boxes, but this is the only edition I have in a box. The paper quality is notably higher than of any of the editions that came out since the Foreign Affairs Association of Japan took over the yearbook in the early 1930s. This edition has heavy yellow leaves between each section to facilitate flipping from section to section. There are also more foldout graphs than in the 1946-48 edition. AdvertisingThere are still many, but fewer, pages of advertising at the very front and back. More ads have been distributed to the front of sections with which the ads are connected. Hence bank ads are collected at the start of the "Banking and Money Market" section and newspaper company ads come at the front of the "Press and Publications" section. There are no ads in sections like "Parties and Politics" or "Allied Occupation and Control of Japan" section. AppendixThe value of this edition lay in the fact that it was published a few months after the end of the Allied Occupation of Japan on 28 April 1952. This permitted the editors to include numerous materials related to the transition from Occupation to restoration of full sovereignty. The appendix is vastly expanded to include many more laws and ordinances. This edition includes the 1950 Nationality Law, and several laws and ordinances related to immigratin. It also includes texts of the peace conferences, peace treaty, and other documents related to the postwar settlements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yoshida's speech at San Francisco Peace ConferenceRepresentatives of 52 states, including Japan, gathered at the San Francisco Opera House from 4-8 September 1951 in what was called the Conference for the Conclusion and Signing of the Treaty of Peace with Japan. Burma, India, and Yugoslavia were invited but did not attend. All attending states -- except the Soviet Union, Poland, and Czechoslovakia -- signed the treaty on 8 September, thus settling some issues related to World War II in Asia and the Pacific but creating others. China and KoreaIn his acceptance speech, Japan's prime minister Yoshida Shigeru regreted that disunity (不統一 futoitsu) prevented China (中国 Chugoku) from attending -- meaning that neither the Republic of China or the People's Republic of China were invited. He made no mention of Korea, where the Republic of Korea and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea were embattled in a war in which many of the states at the conference were participating in one way or another. US forces were doing most of the fighting alongside ROK forces, with other national components of what was officially a United Nations action. Japan, still an occupied country, was logistically supporting the US participation in the war. ROC had also backed the police action against DPRK forces, which had been joined by PRC forces and supported by the USSR and a few other socialist states. Truman and MacArthurPresident Harry Truman of the United States gave the opening speech on 4 September. Prime Minister Yoshida Shigeru of Japan gave the closing speech on 7 September. The conference was the first event to be nationally covered by television in the United States. General MacArthur was not present but made a speech himself on 6 September while in Cleveland. In April that year, Truman had relieved MacArthur of his post as the supreme commander of US forces, and commander-in-chief of UN forces, in Korea. Yoshida Shigeru's acceptance speechPerhaps the most interesting document, though, is the then publicized English version of the speech Prime Minister Yoshida Shigeru gave at the peace conference in San Francisco on the eve of the signing of the peace treaty. The full text of this document is shown in the following table, with what appears to be the official Japanese and English versions. What Yoshida Shigeru said about Karafuto and ChishimaRichard B. Finn makes this observation about the speech Japan's Prime Minister Yoshida Shigeru made on 7 September 1951 at the San Francisco peace conference (Richard B. Finn, Winners in Peace: MacArthur, Yoshida, and Postwar Japan, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992 (pages 303-304). . . . Yoshida had planned to speak in English. Sebald and State Department experts asked to see his text, thought "it was not good," and proceeded to rewrite much of the text. They also suggested that it would be more dignified if Yoshida spoke in his native tongue. Yoshida and his advisers accepted all of this somewhat overbearing advice. . . . [ . . . ] One of the historical curiosities of Yoshida's address was that he decided to cut down the length of his delivery as he went along. He wrote in his memoirs that he realized as he talked that almost no one in the audience understood what he was saying, and so he decided, in his whimsical way, to skip some of the text as he read it. His skilled interpreter, Shimanouchi Toshiro, later a distinguished ambassador, had experienced this kind of challenge before and neatly timed his version to coincide with the prime minister's. Yoshida's speech was inscribed on rice paper wound in scroll form, which fascinated observers. Reporters wrote the next day about the "toilet paper" his speech was written on. That Yoshida signed the peace treaty in the victor's country did not set well with nationalists in Japan. Some nationalists still bristle at the thought of Yoshida writing a speech, which celebrated the anticipation of the restoration of full sovereignty, equality, freedom to Japan, in the victor's language. The speech, however, is worth reading in both languages and all versions. Here are what appear to be the standard Japanese and English versions in a collection of Ministry of Foreign Affairs records compiled in 1970, and an English version published in 1952 in a yearbook edited by the Foreign Affairs Association of Japan. It is worth noting the discrepancies in the two published English versions -- and wondering what Yoshida actually said in San Francisco about islands that continue to be objects of a territorial dispute between Japan and Russia, who for this reason have yet to sign a peace treaty.
|
1953 New Japan | |
The Mainichi Newspapers |
|
1964 Japan: Its Land, People and Culture | ||
Japanese National Commission for UNESCO The colophon in the back gives the Japanese title 外国人のための日本事典 (Gaikokujin no tame no Nihon jiten) or "Japan encyclopedia for foreigners". It's official publication date was 1 October 1964. The colophon bears the registration number "MEJ 9643" and an impression of an inspection seal reading 文部省 (Monbusho) or "Ministry of Education". 1 October 1964 was the date the Tokaido Shinkansen "Bullet Train" began operating between Tokyo and Osaka -- just in time to accommodate the 1964 Summer Olympics, hosted in Tokyo from 10-24 October. The First Edition was published in 1958 (preface dated 1 November), and the copyright holder of both editions was the Ministry of Education (文部省 Monbusho), which had juristiction over the Japanese National Commission for UNESCO (日本ユネスコ国内委員会 Nihon Yunesuko Kokunai Iinkai). However, they were printed and published by the Printing Bureau, then part of the Ministry of Finance (大蔵省印刷局 Okurasho Insatsukyoku). The "Preface to Revised Edition" thanks "Mr. Geoffrey Bownas, Lecuturer at Oxford University, whose painstaking efforts made the difficult task of revision possible" (page 1). |
||
The Japanese race, people, nationThe "encyclopedia for foreigners" wastes no time in boasting about "the Japanese race" and its essentially otherworldly uniqueness. The two-page "General Introduction" -- preceding the Explanatory Notes and Contents sets the tone for the entire book (front matter, pages 5-6). I have also shown the first two paragraphs of the main text, which begins with an overview of the history of Japan (page 1).
|